Reconciliation and the Supreme Court: The Opposing Views of Chief Justices Lamer and McLachlin
Articles » Scholarly, peer reviewed
Author/Creator
Kent McNeil
Indigenous Law Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, Fall, 2003, pp. 1-25
Description
Analysis of a series of cases to illustrate how the line of reasoning varies in decisions that attempt to reconcile Aboriginal rights and the interests of other parties; author examines judges decisions in relation to reconciliation and justification.