Aboriginal Law 101
Aboriginal Law 2016: Year in Review
Aboriginal Rights Claims and the Making and Remaking of History
Aboriginal Rights Claims and the Making and Remaking of History
Aboriginal Rights, Title and the Duty to Consult: Summaries of Supreme Court Ruling That Have Formed Aboriginal Rights, Title and Duty to Consult
Access to Justice for Indigenous Adult Victims of Sexual Assault
Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl: Policing Authenticity, Implicit Racial Bias, and Continued Harm to American Indian Families
"Another Chapter in the Pursuit of Reconciliation and Redress...": A Summary of Daniels v. Canada at the Supreme Court of Canada
Archiving Force: Ethics and Consignation
Asserting Tribal Sovereignty through Compact Negotiations: A Case Study of the Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana
Being Métis in Canada: An Unsettled Identity
Bill S-3: A Rushed Response to Descheneaux
Bill introduced to comply with Court's decision in Descheneaux et al., v. Canada (Attorney General), which found current <i>Indian Act</i> violated equality provisions of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Court case involved eligibility for Indian Status.
Comments on the proposed Act rather than the final version.
Bill S-3, An Act to amend the Indian Act (elimination of sex-based Inequities in registration)
Bill S-3: An Act to amend the Indian Act (elimination of sex-based inequities in registration)
Blockades or Breakthroughs? Aboriginal Peoples Confront the Canadian State
Boil-Water Advisories and Federal (In)Action: The Politics of Potable Water in Pikangikum First Nation
The Canadian Crown's Duty to Consult Indigenous Nations' Knowledge Systems in Federal Environmental Assessments
Centre of Excellence for Matrimonial Real Property
Challenging Historical Frameworks: Aboriginal Rights, The Trickster, and Originalism
Child Advocacy in Saskatchewan Child Welfare Cases: Access to Justice and Indigenous Children's Rights
The Child and Family Services Act in Relation to Indigenous Children: Does it Measure up to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission Report?
La communauté comme sujet et objet du droit: implications
pour les Métis du Canada = The Law of the Community and Community Rights: Implications for the Métis in Canada
The Community Conundrum: Metis Critical Perspectives
on the Application of R v Powley in British Columbia
Con(TEXT) 1: A Project Fact (A) Update for 26 April 2018
Plain language explanation of legal principles involved in analysis of R. v. Stanley, the case in which Gerald Stanley, a Saskatchewan farmer, was charged with second-degree murder in the shooting death of a 22-year-old Cree man, Colton Boushie, and was subsequently acquitted.
The Constitutional Status and Rights of the Métis People in Canada
Court of Appeal Holds Duty to Consult Does Not Apply to Statutory Interpretation
Cultural Genocide in Canada? It Did Happen Here
Culture in Schooling in the Inuvialuit Settlement Region
Daniels v Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development)
Daniels v. Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development), 2016 SCC 12
Daniels v. Canada: Origins, Intentions, Futures
Dealing with the “Community Conundrum”: Métis Responses to the Application of R v Powley in British Columbia—Litigation, Negotiation, and Practice
Descheneaux Information Session--PTMA Toolkit
Descheneaux v. Canada, 2015 QCCS 3555 – Case Summary
Destabilizing the Consultation Framework in Alberta's Tar Sands
Dreaming from the Margins, Living in the In-Between: Identity, Culture, and the Power of Voice
Uses historical documents in conjuction with Louise Erdrich’s The Round House, Sherman Alexie’s The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian and Dreaming in Indian: Contemporary Native American Voices. Developed for use in Advanced Placement English Literature or Language classroom, Grades 11 and 12.