Daniels v. Canada: Origins, Intentions, Futures

Discusses case involving Métis and Non-Status Indians. Plaintiffs sought three declarations: that the two groups are "Indians" as defined by the Constitution Act, 1867; that the Crown owes a fiduciary duty to them; and they have the right to be consulted and negotiated with as to their rights, interests, and needs.
Author/Creator
Joseph Eliot Magnet
Open Access
Yes
Primary Source
No
Citation
Aboriginal Policy Studies, vol. 6, no. 2, 2017, pp. 26-47
Publication Date
2017
Location
Resource Type
Articles -- Scholarly, peer reviewed
Format
Text -- PDF
Language
Login or Register to create bookmarks.

Export Record

RIS
EndNote
CSV